Product

Channels

Customers

Resources

Pricing

Support

Sign in

Book a demo

Updated February 2026

Support Engineering Index 2026

The clearest picture yet of where the role is heading.

What the data says

Support engineering is splitting into distinct specializations. The IC-to-management pay gap is widening at senior levels. More than half of all listings now reference AI. And the skills employers ask for most often are not the skills that correlate with the highest pay.

That gap between demand and compensation is the most actionable signal in this dataset, whether you are planning your next career move or building a team.

01: The Skills Gap

The most commonly listed skills in support engineering job postings aren't the ones the market rewards most. That mismatch tells a clear story about where the role is heading.

APIs appear in over a third of listings. SQL and Automation each appear in roughly a quarter. These are the baseline expectations, the skills hiring managers write down first.

But when you look at what those skills actually correlate with in terms of compensation, the picture shifts. SQL correlates with a median salary of $98,136. That is seven percent below the national median of $106k (USA).

APIs appear in over a third of listings. SQL and Automation each appear in roughly a quarter. These are the baseline expectations, the skills hiring managers write down first.

The leverage skills

Machine Learning (+51.7%), Kubernetes (+27%), Python (+18.5%), Automation (+16.9%), and JavaScript (+13.7%) all correlate with higher pay.

They appear in fewer listings because fewer candidates have them. That scarcity is exactly what the market is pricing.

Machine Learning (+51.7%), Kubernetes (+27%), Python (+18.5%), Automation (+16.9%), and JavaScript (+13.7%) all correlate with higher pay.

They appear in fewer listings because fewer candidates have them. That scarcity is exactly what the market is pricing.

The Baseline skills

Meanwhile, the most requested skills barely budge compensation.

APIs correlate with just a 2.4% premium. Azure, 2.1%. Docker sits exactly at the median. And SQL, the second most common requirement, actually correlates with a 7% pay decrease relative to the median. These skills get you through the door but they do not move your offer.

Meanwhile, the most requested skills barely budge compensation.

Takeaway

SQL and APIs get you hired. Machine Learning, Kubernetes, and Python get you paid more. The market is rewarding scarcity, not frequency.

A note on correlation: Roles requiring Machine Learning may pay more because they sit at better-funded companies, or because the role itself is more senior. The skill alone does not guarantee the salary. But the pattern is consistent enough to take seriously.

02: Four Paths, One Role

The top-10 skills list creates a misleading picture of uniformity. When you look past the averages and cluster job listings by their actual technical requirements, support engineering is not one role. It is at least four.

The Data Path — This is the closest to traditional support engineering, but expectations around automation and data infrastructure are pushing it further from its origins.

The AI Path — The newest and smallest specialization, but the one with the strongest scarcity-to-compensation ratio in the dataset. Support engineers who can work with models, evaluate outputs, and build prompts are in high demand relative to supply.

The Infra Path — These roles support cloud-native products and require deep infrastructure fluency. The Kubernetes premium (27%) reflects the complexity and scarcity of this skill set in a support context.

The Web Path — These roles live at the application layer, working with customers on frontend integrations, webhook configurations, and API implementations.

The Data Path — This is the closest to traditional support engineering, but expectations around automation and data infrastructure are pushing it further from its origins.

The Web Path — These roles live at the application layer, working with customers on frontend integrations, webhook configurations, and API implementations.

Takeaway

Referencing back to Section 01: the compensation data maps directly onto these paths. Choosing a specialization is also a financial decision.

Please note: these percentages don't add to 100% — plenty of records don't fit neatly into one track, and many roles still ask for a generalist profile. But the existence of clear clusters suggests specialization is becoming a viable career strategy, not just a personal preference.

03: The $62k Fork

For the first few years of a support engineering career, compensation follows a single trajectory. Then, around the senior level, the path splits and the gap never closes.

Up to year two, the trajectory is shared: roughly $63k at year one, $85k at year two. Then the paths diverge.

At the senior level, management roles reach $140,000 while IC roles reach $110,000. That is a meaningful gap, but not a dramatic one.

At the director level, it becomes dramatic. Management roles reach $206,000. IC roles reach $144,000. The gap is $62,000.

Up to year two, the trajectory is shared: roughly $63k at year one, $85k at year two. Then the paths diverge.

At the senior level, management roles reach $140,000 while IC roles reach $110,000. That is a meaningful gap, but not a dramatic one.

At the director level, it becomes dramatic. Management roles reach $206,000. IC roles reach $144,000. The gap is $62,000.

If you're an IC

This does not mean you should switch to management. It means you should know what the pay gap looks like so you can plan around it. A senior IC with Machine Learning or Kubernetes expertise is competing in a different salary band than a senior IC with only baseline skills.

If you're a leader

Your best ICs will notice this divergence. If your compensation structure does not account for it, you have a retention problem, not a one-off negotiation issue. High-value ICs have market alternatives that pay at or above management-track rates so plan accordingly.

Please note: these are medians across the dataset. Individual compensation varies widely by company, location, and skill set. The fork is a pattern, not a rule.

04: Where You Sit Matters

Location still moves the number. The skills, paths, and structural trends in this report are global, but the dollar figures here reflect the US market.

US based roles

California leads at $137k median, followed by New York at $133k. Remote roles track at $105k, essentially identical to the national median of $106k. The rest of the US averages $88k.

The California and New York premiums are substantial, but they come with proportionally higher costs of living.

California leads at $137k median, followed by New York at $133k. Remote roles track at $105k, essentially identical to the national median of $106k. The rest of the US averages $88k.

The California and New York premiums are substantial, but they come with proportionally higher costs of living.

Takeaway

For remote workers, the $105k median suggests that "remote" has become its own compensation tier. If you are remote and below $105k, the market data suggests room to negotiate.

05: Who Hires, Who Pays

Skills and geography matter. So does the type of company you join. The product a company builds is a strong predictor of what it pays its support engineers.

Salary ranges by industry

Developer tools leads with a $127,500 median salary and an upper quartile reaching $175,000. Cloud and data infrastructure follows at $123,500. Fintech and cybersecurity cluster around $100,000. Healthcare tech trails at $87,500.

Takeaway

The pattern is consistent: the more technical the product, the more the company pays for support engineering. Infrastructure and API/platform companies treat support engineers as people who need to deeply understand the system.

06: AI Is In, Degrees Are Out, Equity Is Standard

Beyond skills and salaries, three data points show how the market is treating support engineering as a role.

When half the market offers equity for support engineering, the role is being treated as strategic headcount, not operational cost.

The market is hiring on skills and experience, not credentials. Support engineering is one of the most accessible entry points into technical work.

Either as a product feature or a workflow or process in the tool stack. AI fluency is becoming a baseline expectation, not a differentiator.

Takeaway

These three signals point in the same direction: support engineering is professionalizing. The role is gaining equity, absorbing AI, and dropping degree gates. It is being treated less like a cost center and more like a technical function.

What This Means

Support engineering is professionalizing along the same trajectory that DevOps, SRE, and data engineering followed before it.

The gap between commonly requested skills and highly compensated ones is not a quirk. It is the market telling you where value is moving.

Support engineering is professionalizing along the same trajectory that DevOps, SRE, and data engineering followed before it.

The gap between commonly requested skills and highly compensated ones is not a quirk. It is the market telling you where value is moving.

If you're an IC

Invest in scarce skills, they get you paid.
Pick a specialization. The market is rewarding depth over breadth.
Negotiate with data and know your premium

If you're a leader

Fix the IC ceiling to avoid losing talent
Hire for where the role is going. Build rubrics around tracks.
Pay for your category, not just the role.

Support engineers are not just maintaining systems. They are building them. The data is starting to reflect that.

Methodology

This report draws on two data sources: 1,704 job listings for support engineering roles collected from major job boards and company career pages and 99 responses to a global salary and skills survey of working support engineers.

The job listings provide the market's demand signal: what companies say they want and what they're willing to pay. The survey provides the practitioner signal: what support engineers actually earn, where they work, and how they describe their own skill sets. Where the two sources agree, we have higher confidence. Where they diverge, we note it.

Job listing data: We included roles with titles containing "support engineer," "technical support," "customer engineer," and closely related variants. Of the 1,704 listings, 504 included US salary data. All salary figures are median values based on salary midpoints.

Survey data: 99 support engineers responded across 20+ countries. 52 reported salaries in USD, with the remainder in EUR (24), GBP (13), CAD (3), AUD (3), and other currencies. Respondents skewed mid-level (50%) and remote (64%). 66% reported receiving equity. The survey is self-selected and not statistically representative, but it adds a practitioner perspective that job listings alone cannot provide.

Skill extraction: Skills were extracted from job description text using keyword matching against a curated taxonomy. Skills were categorized as technical skills (e.g., Python, SQL, APIs) or tools (e.g., AWS, Kubernetes). Salary premiums are calculated as the percentage difference between the median salary of roles listing a given skill and the overall US median.

Specialization tracks: The four specialization tracks (Data, AI, Infrastructure, Web) were identified by clustering co-occurring technical skills. A listing was classified into a track if it met a threshold of skills from that cluster. Listings could match zero or one track; there was no forced assignment.

Experience and seniority: Seniority levels were derived from job title classification and years of experience requirements in the listing. The IC vs. management distinction was based on whether the listing included people management responsibilities.

Limitations: This report analyzes what companies post, not what they ultimately offer or hire for. Salary data skews toward companies that publish ranges, which is increasingly common due to pay transparency laws but still not universal. Skill-salary correlations do not imply causation: roles listing Machine Learning may pay more because they sit at better-funded companies, not because of the skill alone. The survey is self-selected with 99 responses and should not be read as statistically representative. Both data sources capture a snapshot of the market in early 2026.